Barrister Gohar Criticizes Government, Demands Opposition’s Input in Budget Approval

Islamabad: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman and Senior Parliamentary Leader Barrister Gohar Ali Khan has strongly criticized the federal government, urging that the opposition’s proposals be included in the federal budget. He warned that without the Senate’s approval, the finance bill would be constitutionally questionable and controversial.
Addressing the National Assembly and speaking to the media, Barrister Gohar described the proposed budget of 16 billion rupees as unjust, stating that the assembly had consistently failed in its responsibilities. He emphasized the need to consider what relief could be provided to the people of Pakistan. He also made a specific demand, calling for the exemption of income tax for those earning up to 2.2 million rupees annually.
Barrister Gohar pointed out the absence of ministers during the budget session, a situation that he said reflected the government’s indifference toward the Assembly and the public. He further stated that public money should be spent on public welfare, and called for the inclusion of opposition recommendations in the budget-making process.
In his media address, Gohar also criticized the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), accusing them of supporting the government’s policies. He remarked, “The PPP has previously voted in favor of the government, and they will likely support the budget again.” He urged the government to work with the opposition and develop a unified economic policy by incorporating their suggestions into the budget.
Discussing reforms in the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), Barrister Gohar stressed the need for restructuring. He pointed out that the FBR currently employs unnecessary staff, including 16 Director Generals, who he claimed were a burden on the national treasury. He called for a thorough overhaul to ensure transparency and efficiency in the institution.
Additionally, Gohar proposed removing property duty in Islamabad to stimulate the real estate sector and attract more investment. He concluded by stating, “We sit here using the people’s money, and this budget holds no significance if it does not serve the public interest. Countries like India give relief to their citizens in their budgets, and we should follow suit.”