Muhammad Rizwan Writes Third Letter to NCCIA, Seeks Clarity Over Allegations

Pakistan national cricket team wicketkeeper-batter Muhammad Rizwan has written a third letter to the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA) regarding allegations against him, seeking clarification on the scope and nature of the inquiry.

In his latest letter, Rizwan confirmed that he had received the NCCIA’s notice and would appear before the agency on October 2 to join the investigation.

Rizwan sought clarification regarding the allegations, noting that the first notice had mentioned accusations related to online betting and gambling. He said that during proceedings in court, the agency had referred to a provision concerning electronic fraud under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) 2016.

However, he pointed out that the latest notice does not mention allegations of online betting or gambling. He requested the NCCIA to clarify the apparent change and provide details about the current scope of the inquiry.

Rizwan raised several questions, asking whether the investigation was still related to online betting or gambling and which specific provisions of PECA 2016 were applicable to the inquiry. He also requested written clarification if the scope of the investigation had changed following the earlier notice.

The wicketkeeper-batter further asked whether the allegations concerning betting and gambling, which could affect his reputation and cricket career, had been communicated to the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), the International Cricket Council (ICC) Anti-Corruption Unit, or any other relevant cricketing body.

He also asked whether the NCCIA had obtained information from or contacted the PCB or ICC in connection with the investigation.

Regarding his mobile phone, Rizwan said the device was currently in the NCCIA’s possession. He stated that he had provided the password in England and that the device had been reopened and examined in his presence during his first appearance before the agency.

Rizwan said he had not been provided with a receipt for the seizure of his mobile phone, a warrant, custody record, or any written document explaining the agency’s continued possession of the device.

He asked the NCCIA to clarify what further personal cooperation was required from him for the forensic examination. Rizwan also requested that the forensic examination be completed without further delay and that his mobile phone be returned immediately afterward.

Rizwan maintained that he had still not been informed clearly about the exact allegation against him. He reiterated that he was ready to fully cooperate with and assist any lawful investigation.