Swaat’s Anti-Encroachment Drive Faces Allegations of Favoritism, Political Backlash Intensifies

The ongoing anti-encroachment operation along the riverbanks in Swat has come under intense scrutiny after claims that powerful figures were spared from demolition efforts. While the district administration cleared more than 25 hotels and other illegal structures in areas like Fiza Gat and Bypass, the operation stalled when it came to dealing with properties owned by influential personalities.

One of the key flashpoints was a hotel owned by Federal Minister Ameer Muqam, which was partially demolished before the operation was halted. Sources claim that after the hotel management presented legal documents, the administration suspended the operation, allowing the establishment to escape full demolition. This led to significant public outcry, as the operation had been unhesitatingly carried out against common citizens, but powerful figures appeared to be exempt from the law.

The interruption of the operation has led to widespread criticism, with locals accusing the authorities of double standards. Citizens have raised questions about whether the law in Swat applies only to those without political power or connections, while influential figures remain above the law.

Ameer Muqam Slams Anti-Encroachment Operation, Calls It Political Vendetta

On the other hand, Federal Minister Ameer Muqam, who is also a leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), has strongly criticized the operation, labeling it a political vendetta. In a statement, Muqam condemned the demolition of his legally owned hotel, claiming that the action was politically motivated. He emphasized that the hotel’s documents, including ownership papers, NOCs (No Objection Certificates), and approved maps, were all in order, and the demolition was unwarranted.

Muqam further asserted that the provincial government’s actions were an attempt to cover up its administrative failures through political retribution. He vowed to take legal action against the authorities for the illegal demolition of his property.

The political and public backlash against the operation is growing, with many questioning whether the current anti-encroachment drive is truly impartial or if it is being manipulated for political purposes. Political analysts suggest that Muqam’s statement could escalate the situation further, as the controversy surrounding the operation deepens.

Future Plans for Demarcation and the Question of Equal Justice

In response to the growing criticism, the district administration has announced plans to begin demarcation along the riverbanks to prevent future illegal construction. However, the ongoing situation has once again raised the critical question of whether the law in Pakistan applies equally to everyone, or if influential individuals can manipulate the system for their benefit.

As the controversy continues to unfold, many are left wondering whether the government will take action to ensure that the anti-encroachment drive remains transparent, fair, and free from political interference.