Tensions Rise Between PPP and PML-N Over Development Projects and Coordination
Lahore:A recent meeting of the Coordination Committee between Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) at the Governor House Punjab has brought tensions between the two parties to light. The meeting, which was led by PML-N’s Ishaq Dar, saw participation from key figures such as Rana Sanaullah, Khawaja Saad Rafique, and Maryam Aurangzeb, while PPP was represented by Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, Nadeem Afzal Chan, Ali Haider Gilani, and others.
PPP members strongly criticized PML-N’s approach to development projects, specifically targeting the short-term initiatives launched by Maryam Nawaz, including the ‘Apni Chhat Apna Ghar’ housing project and tractor schemes for farmers. PPP leaders questioned the effectiveness of these programs, stating that they had not yielded tangible results and that new projects were being launched continuously without following through on previous ones.
The PPP representatives also expressed concerns over being excluded from consultations regarding crucial legislation such as the land tax bill passed in the Punjab Assembly. They voiced opposition to the tax, arguing that it unfairly burdens farmers, with no consultation from the PPP.
Additionally, PPP leaders raised objections to PML-N’s media briefings about the meetings, accusing them of misrepresenting the nature of discussions. They suggested that future coordination committee meetings should involve joint media briefings to provide clarity on the topics discussed and the outcomes.
On a more positive note, both parties agreed on a few key issues, including the provision of land for a university in Raja Pervaiz Ashraf’s constituency, and the appointment of development committee chairpersons in PPP-majority districts. A subcommittee has been formed to follow up on the decisions, and another meeting is scheduled for April 12 at the Governor House.
The political dynamics between PPP and PML-N seem to be evolving, with both sides seeking better cooperation on governance, while also raising concerns over transparency and inclusion in decision-making processes.
