Pakistan Defends Military Court Verdicts on May 9 Events Amid Criticism from U.S., UK, and EU
Islamabad:In response to concerns raised by the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union regarding the military court sentences for those involved in the May 9, 2023 events, Pakistan has reaffirmed its commitment to upholding its legal framework in accordance with international agreements.
Foreign Office spokesperson, **Mumtaz Zahra Baloch**, addressed the issue during a press briefing, stating that Pakistan’s legal system is fully aligned with international human rights obligations, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). She emphasized that Pakistan’s legal processes are conducted under parliamentary-approved laws and the decisions of the Supreme Court, which provide opportunities for judicial review, while ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
**Pakistan’s Commitment to Human Rights:**
Mumtaz Zahra Baloch reiterated that Pakistan is fully committed to fulfilling its international human rights duties and maintaining compliance with the **Generalized Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+)** and other key international human rights conventions. “Pakistan’s legal framework provides for proper judicial oversight and the protection of fundamental rights in line with international standards,” she said, adding that Pakistan is open to constructive dialogue on democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.
She also assured that Pakistan will continue to work closely with international partners, including the European Union, to ensure the enforcement of international human rights laws and the protection of rights within the country.
**International Criticism:**
The issue arose after military courts in Pakistan convicted **25 individuals** involved in the May 9 incidents, sentencing them to prison terms ranging from 2 to 10 years. The **United States**, **United Kingdom**, and the **European Union** expressed serious concern over these convictions, particularly criticizing the use of military courts to try civilians.
The **U.S. State Department** voiced alarm over the military tribunal sentences, suggesting that such actions undermine basic principles of justice. Similarly, the **European Union** highlighted that the trial of civilians in military courts violated international conventions to which Pakistan is a signatory. **Britain** also raised concerns, stating that these proceedings violated fundamental principles of justice and undermined the protection of public rights.
**Pakistan’s Legal Stance:**
In response, Mumtaz Zahra Baloch emphasized that these military court decisions were made in accordance with Pakistan’s laws, which were approved by Parliament and upheld by the country’s judiciary. She noted that Pakistan remains committed to fulfilling its responsibilities under international human rights agreements and will continue to engage with global partners to ensure adherence to these laws.
**Future Dialogue on Human Rights:**
Baloch further stated that Pakistan values its relationship with international allies and remains committed to dialogue to resolve any concerns regarding human rights. “We will continue our efforts to ensure the full implementation of human rights conventions and maintain strong relations with our international partners,” she affirmed.
The **military court sentences** for the May 9 events have stirred debate on the balance between national security concerns and civilian rights. While Pakistan maintains that its actions comply with both domestic and international law, the criticism from Western nations has underscored global scrutiny of military tribunals and civilian justice.
This ongoing dialogue between Pakistan and its international partners reflects the complexities of upholding national security while ensuring adherence to fundamental human rights principles in a democratic society.
