My Statement Regarding Uzma Bukhari Was Misinterpreted

Islamabad (Qudrat Daily) — Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Minister for Information Shafi Jan has said that his statement regarding Uzma Bukhari was misinterpreted. “Was an apology sought for calling Pashtuns wild? Speaking on Geo News’ program, he said that his statement regarding Uzma Bukhari was misinterpreted. “Has Uzma Bukhari apologized for calling Pashtuns wild? The kind of wild statements they are making, we also have people who can go there and make wild statements. If someone is drawing a wrong meaning from it, that is a question of their mentality. If Uzma Bukhari apologizes, then I will also not make the statement.”
He said, “The statement Maryam Nawaz gave — is that correct? It means she has given Modi a clean chit, while she is calling the provinces responsible. Maryam Nawaz’s statement regarding smaller provinces is equivalent to breaking the country. The country is in danger from this woman.”
On the other hand, former minister Fawad Chaudhry’s wife Hiba Fawad has said that the language Shafi Jan used today about Uzma Bukhari is extremely shameful.
In her tweet on X, she said that the language Shafi Jan used today about Uzma Bukhari is extremely condemnable and shameful. Political differences are one thing, but ridiculing a woman is unacceptable in any way. Just one question for Shafi Jan: Are the mother, sister, and daughter of your own home also addressed in the same language? Differ, criticize, but do not forget civility and limits.
شفیع جان نے آج عظمیٰ بخاری کے بارے میں جو زبان استعمال کی، وہ انتہائی قابلِ مذمت اور شرمناک ہے۔ سیاسی اختلاف اپنی جگہ، مگر کسی خاتون کی تضحیک کسی صورت قابلِ قبول نہیں۔
شفیع جان سے صرف ایک سوال: کیا آپ کے اپنے گھر کی ماں، بہن اور بیٹی کو بھی اسی زبان سے پکارا جاتا ہے؟ اختلاف…
— Hiba Fawad (@HibaFawadPk) September 11, 2026
Hiba Fawad said that differences are one thing, but ridiculing women is unacceptable. Shafi Jan should clarify his words and apologize for this inappropriate language. Respect for women is essential.
27 ستمبر کو خیبرپختونخوا سے آئیں گے، روک سکتے ہو تو روک لو۔
"اٹک ریڈ لائن ہے" کہنے والوں کو ہم بتا چکے ہیں کہ عوامی جدوجہد کو کوئی ریڈ لائن نہیں روک سکتی۔ رانا ثناء اللہ کان کھول کر سن لے27 ستمبر کو خیبرپختونخوا سے آئیں گے، اگر کسی میں ہمت ہے تو روک کر دکھائے۔#ShafiJan… pic.twitter.com/g1g3FDDT9M
— Shafi Jan (@ShafiJanPTI) September 11, 2026
It may be recalled that Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Minister for Information Shafi Jan said in the KP Assembly that Maryam Nawaz will have to apologize for her statement. “They call Pashtuns wild. If wild ones are so liked, we can send them. We will keep demanding an apology from Maryam Nawaz again and again.”
He said that Maryam Nawaz, by declaring Modi innocent, has rubbed salt on the nation’s wounds. Saying that Punjab is threatened not by a neighboring country but by neighboring provinces is not only equivalent to giving a clean chit to the enemy India but is also an open negation of the Pakistan Army’s four-year stance and the national narrative against Indian aggression. If there is no threat from the enemy, then who is responsible for Modi’s aggression and conspiracies against Pakistan? Targeting one’s own provinces is the height of political bias.
He said that from Dawn Leaks and Memogate to today’s statement, the nation remembers everything. Indian media has been continuously running propaganda for a week over Maryam Nawaz’s statement. In Punjab, every tactic is being used against PTI workers and political opponents, but not a single word comes out against Modi. If ignoring the enemy and declaring one’s own provinces a threat is not political bias, then what is? Rana Sanaullah sees only May 9 in every political struggle.
He says another May 9 is being prepared. A person thinks according to the mentality he has; their mindset is that of Model Town and Mureed. And today, on the basis of evidence given by the institutions they are speaking about, allegations of electoral links with banned organizations and their workers have surfaced against Rana Sanaullah in the past. First give an account of your own past, then point fingers at others.





