Imran Khan, Murad Saeed and Sohail Afridi Are Three Names for the Same Thing: Khawaja Asif
ISLAMABAD (Qudrat Daily) — Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said that Imran Khan, Murad Saeed and Sohail Afridi are three names for the same thing; their stakes were very high, and they had dealings with terrorists. Speaking on a Geo News programme, he said that Imran Khan, Murad Saeed and Sohail Afridi are three names for the same thing; their interests were high and they had dealings with terrorists.
Now if someone says the army took away mines and minerals, then someone should tell us that mines and minerals are with PTI’s relatives.
Khawaja Asif said that after the vote of no-confidence against Imran Khan and the formation of the PDM government, the establishment called a meeting of all political parties, in which all of us were in favour of holding immediate elections, but Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and the Awami National Party were not in favour of immediate elections; their eyes were on wealth.
عمران خان، سہیل آفریدی اور مراد سعید تینوں ایک ہی چیز کے تین نام ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
@ShahzadIqbalGEO #PTI #ImranKhan https://t.co/FlZbPLXZUJ— Ali Hassan (@AliJrnlst) October 16, 2026
عمران خان، سہیل آفریدی اور مراد سعید تینوں ایک ہی چیز کے تین نام ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
@ShahzadIqbalGEO #PTI #ImranKhan https://t.co/FlZbPLXZUJ— Ali Hassan (@AliJrnlst) October 16, 2026
He said that the people whose names he mentioned were not in favour of holding immediate elections; they wanted to run their meters for a year. They ran their meters, and within a year the entire political landscape was overturned. I and the Muslim League-N were in favour of holding immediate elections. In the meeting that Shehbaz Sharif attended, I also said that elections should be held within one month.
These are the people whose eyes were on wealth; even now their eyes were on power — that PTI’s government has been dissolved and they should have been given a chance to play, but they were not given it.
Khawaja Asif said that Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Aimal Wali Khan did not get a share in the current setup in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, therefore they are speaking against it. Or those people who belong to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa wanted that whatever new setup would be in KP, they would get a role in it, but they could not get a role, therefore they are now taking a stand. I believe that by making such statements they are being unjust to their own province.
